Cricinfo England

home Widgets Top Performer Philips Moments Photos Airtel mChek Help and Feedback



England


News

Features

Photos

England fixtures

County Cricket 2008

2008 Statistics

Domestic Teams

Domestic History

Players/Officials

Grounds

Records

Web Links



 

Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation
India v Australia
Bangladesh v N Zealand
T20 Canada
Stanford 20/20 for 20
ICC Intercontinental Cup
ICC WCL Division 4
Indian Cricket League
Current and Future Tours
News
Photos | Wallpapers
Cricinfo Magazine
Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings
Wisden Almanack
Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout
Daily Newsletter
Toolbar
Widgets



Backing for controversial umpire

Willey welcomes Hair recall

Cricinfo staff

April 8, 2008


Peter Willey: "If the technology that they use on the TV is 100% accurate, I would say use the TV. But I don't think it is 100% accurate" © Getty Images
 

Peter Willey, the chairman of the umpires' association, has admitted he is pleased to see Darrell Hair restored to the ICC's elite panel. Hair was removed from the elite panel in the aftermath of The Oval Test in 2006 but the ICC have now welcomed him back into the fold.

"I think everyone felt for Darrell as an umpire really," he said. "He did what he thought was right. He wasn't backed up and he paid the price. I am glad he has come back, I hope he does well and has a long future as a Test umpire. I've always found him an honest man and a good umpire. He is a strong umpire. Some people don't like that."

Willey, a former England batsman who went on to umpire in 25 Tests, also defended umpires in general, adding that TV replays were putting them under increasing pressure.

"When I finished, all this technology was just coming in and you've got the added pressure of, every time you go in the middle, of everything being dissected in super slow-motion. People forget you've got a split-second to give an honest decision.

"If the technology that they use on the TV is 100% accurate, I would say use the TV. But I don't think it is 100% accurate. There are loads of things they can't pick up. I don't agree with Hawkeye. I don't think it gives a very honest description of where the ball pitches or is going. On certain pitches, you pitch the ball in the same spot and one delivery will go up and one will go down so, how they can predict where the ball will go, I just don't know.

"Then there is the case of bat-pad appeals. They tried it out a competition in South Africa a few years ago. Batsmen were asked to give an honest opinion on six bat-pad catches and every time the TV got it wrong. It is very difficult, even in slow motion, to decide whether the ball has hit the bat or not."

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback
Watch our daily Cricinfo SportsCenter news round-ups
Available on Cricinfo.tv
    Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now!
Cricinfo Widgets
    Fantasy cricket: India v Australia and Bangladesh v New Zealand
Login to check the standings



Related Links



Stories

Players/Umpires

Teams






Sponsored Links
Check out all the action only on Tour Diaries
Brought to you by Airtel
2/3 BHK Homes.Search NOW!
Makaan.com
Bright Moments
Brought to you by Philips
Gatorade Pacers 2008
Register Now
Follow the new 2008/09 Premier League season
On ESPNsoccernet
 
Cricinfo Products
Fantasy cricket - India v Aus & Bangladesh v NZ
Check the standings
Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now
Portable apps for your site
 


 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories